Awareness of IBCA and understanding of its role
Awareness of IBCA is lower than the Infected Blood Scandal itself
Slightly over half of the respondents (53%) have heard of IBCA, compared to almost four in five (79%) who have heard of the Infected Blood Scandal. Very few respondents have detailed knowledge of IBCA with only 10% knowing a lot/a fair amount about IBCA.
Before this survey, how much, if anything, did you know about the Infected Blood Compensation Authority?| A lot | 2% |
| A fair amount | 8% |
| A little | 21% |
| Heard about | 22% |
| Never heard of | 44% |
This table shows awareness levels of the Infected Blood Compensation Authority: 2% know a lot, 8% know a fair amount, 21% know a little, 22% have heard about it, and 44% have never heard of it.
While only 10% say that they know a lot or a fair amount about IBCA, over half (53%) have heard of IBCA in some capacity.
How well, if at all, would you say you understand the role of the Infected Blood Compensation Authority in providing compensation for those impacted by the Infected Blood Scandal?| Very well | 4% |
| Fairly well | 30% |
| Not very well | 48% |
| Not at all well | 14% |
| Don't know / prefer not to say | 5% |
This table shows how well respondents understand the role of the Infected Blood Compensation Authority: 4% understand very well, 30% understand fairly well, 48% do not understand very well, 14% do not understand at all well, and 5% don't know or prefer not to say.
Three in five respondents (62%) don't understand IBCA's role well, while only a third (34%) say they understand the role well, which includes 4% who say they understand it very well.