Skip to main content

This is a new website. Help us improve it and give your feedback.

Communications about the compensation scheme

Official channels are viewed as key

The IBCA community views official channels, such as the IBCA website, as a reliable and trusted source of information, with over three quarters (76%) typically visiting the website for updates, and over half (59%) viewing it as a trustworthy source of accurate information.

Have you seen, heard or read any information about the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme recently?
Yes 89%
No 10%
Prefer not to say 2%
Any information 96%
Via email (e.g. from the Infected Blood Compensation Authority) 77%
Social media (for example, Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok) 38%
Online forums or communities 35%

*The information in the table is limited to the four top sources of information only.

The most common offline source of information was TV programmes or news (28%).

Can you describe the information you saw, heard or read? What did it look/sound like? What did it show or say?
Compensation Scheme (NET) 52%
Timetable / Delays 40%
Compensation Scheme in general 7%
Statistics (number of claims processed / amount paid) 6%
Claim process 5%
Efficiency 4%
Evading responsibility 4%
Eligibility 3%
Staff 3%
Injustice 2%

Comments from respondents included:

  • "I am registered to receive emails from IBCA - so I see everything they send out. I am in several Facebook communities which provide information daily. I also receive updates from the Inquiry team, including recently the latest updated witness statements and an invitation to tell Sir Brian Langstaff and his team how I view the IBCA and the compensation scheme."
  • "I've seen a lot of information, its good to have the calculator but that aside most of the information is generic and doesn't seem to address the issues that are of real concern."
  • "Clear information but it is very hard to accept time it is taking to make payments quickly to those eligible"
  • "IBCA update emails. The minutes of the delegated legislation reviews in the House of Lords and House of Commons. Facebook groups for infected and affected people"
What, if anything, have you done / intend to do as a result of seeing, hearing or reading any information about the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme?
Action taken Intended action
Sign(ed) up for updates from IBCA 61% 27%
Visit(ed) the IBCA website 56% 36%
Discuss(ed) the scheme with family or friends 55% 36%
Look(ed) up more information about the scheme 40% 26%
Share(d) information about the scheme with family or friends 35% 27%
Search(ed) on the internet for more information about the scheme 34% 23%
Visited gov.uk 33% Not asked
Emailed IBCA 31% Not asked
Call(ed) IBCA by telephone 25% 17%
Contact(ed) a support organisation 20% 17%
Seek(sought) legal advise 17% 25%
Donate(d) to a charity / support organisation 3% 3%

As a result of seeing, hearing or reading any information about the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme, most signed up for updates from IBCA (61%) and visited the IBCA website (56%). This is reflective of the general trend of IBCA respondents gravitating towards official IBCA communication sources.

Where do you typically go for updates or information on issues related to the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme?
The Infected Blood Compensation Authority website 76%
Online forums or communities, including charity websites 33%
Social media (for example Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok) 31%
Family or friends 14%
Another government website 13%
Newspapers and magazines (including websites) 10%
NHS websites 9%
Emails / updates (from IBCA) 4%
My GP or another healthcare professional 2%
Charities (for example Haemophilia Society / Haemophilia Wales / Hep C Trust) 2%
None of the above 3%
Which sources do you trust most for accurate information on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme?
The Infected Blood Compensation Authority website 59%
Online forums or communities 25%
Another government website, such as gov.uk 19%
Social media 14%
NHS websites 7%
News websites 6%
Newspapers and magazines 4%
Legal representatives / solicitors 2%
Charities 2%
My GP / Haematology Consultant 2%
None of the above 10%
Don't know / Prefer not to say 5%
What information would you find useful to receive about the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme?
Compensation timelines 47%
Service (assistance / procedures) 25%
Why slow speed of payments 19%
Transparency 8%
Tangible actions IBCA are taking 8%

Comments from respondents included:

  • "When I will receive my compensation"
  • "When it will all be finally over"
  • "A clear breakdown of when we can claim and for what. I'm still not clear if I can claim for [redacted] as a bereaved partner or if that falls under 'estate claims' or both. And with all the emails and calls for signing up before the deadline, it's been totally unclear who should be signing up…? Clarity and speed are what we need."
  • "[…] No one has contacted my partner as yet as the infected person nor myself as to the affected person. It is very confusing and breeds mistrust."
  • "That they are pulling their fingers out and compensating everyone starting with the infected. There seems no urgency even though there are deaths every week."
  • "The actual commencement date for paying estates of loved ones who were infected in the 70's and 80's, bore the worst of the stigma in early 80's, and died in 90's. And their families suffered with them and are STILL suffering. 50 years of suffering is too much to bear now."
  • "A realistic timeline of expansion. Potential date that I will be notified to start my claim"
  • "An invitation to claim before I die"
  • "To be clear & honest & stop pretending they are working for the infected community and own up to trying to save money for government."
  • "Transparency. The truth. Independent information from government."
  • "All of it in plain English"

Help us improve the IBCA website

Tell us how we can improve this page.